
U.S. President Donald Trump (left) and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un meet in Singapore on June 12, 2018. Trump and Kim held the historic meeting in hopes of ending decades of hostility and the threat of North Korea's nuclear program.
Over the past few days, I've been asked numerous times who was the "winner" of the historic summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un . My reply: You're asking the wrong question. The summit was not a competition between the United States and North Korea to determine a victor — if it were, it would have been doomed from the start. A summit is not something to be scored like a boxing match. There is no clear-cut winner or loser, because international relations do not work in such a simplistic manner. Rather, for all its on-again, off-again drama, political pageantry, odd videos and relatively benign final document, the summit marked a potential shift in the paradigm for U.S.-North Korean relations. Let's begin by accepting that there clearly remain decades of distrust and misaligned interests between Washington and Pyongyang.